Monday 19 November 2012

Test Tube Dinosaurs

Will Jurassic Park become reality?

Test Tube Dinosaurs? - London Student
19 Nov 2012 | News and Features
Written by Helga Groll
Dinosaurs, the giant primeval beasts, have fascinated old and young for generations. Michael Crichton and Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park has inspired fantasies that we might one day see these prehistoric creatures in real life. In the movie, scientists used dinosaur blood from the stomachs of fossilised parasitic insects that were once sucking on T-rex and Co to extract DNA and bring the fearsome reptiles back to life.
Recent studies have investigated how plausible this DNA preservation and extraction could be. An Australian research team used buried Moa bones to conclude that DNA would not survive longer than 6.8 million years. A pretty impressive time span, however dinosaurs first appeared around 230 millions of years ago, and died out almost 70 million years ago.
The international research group examined 150 leg bones of the Moa, a giant extinct bird. The bones ranged between about 600 and 8,000 years old and were collected from three different sites. Palaeo-geneticists led by Morten Allentoft at the University of Copenhagen and Michael Bunce at Murdoch University in Perth, Australia found the half-life of DNA to be 521 years. This meant that after 521 years, half of the bonds in DNA had degraded, leaving half of the genetic information unreadable.
DNA has a limited ‘life span’ or, more accurately, chemical stability. Without the repair mechanisms present in a living cell, DNA decays and is eaten by micro-organisms. After 6.8 million years, the DNA would be completely destroyed. This makes finding intact DNA from more than 100 million years ago, the ‘prime time’ of dinosaurs, very unlikely. As for DNA long enough to be sequenced in a lab and studied, Dr Allenthoft says “such fragments will be gone long before the 6.8 million year mark”. Such a result would shatter hopes that we will be buying our tickets to a real Jurassic Park in the near future.
However, another recent study of ancient bones suggests there could be a twist in the story. The team analysed bones cells (osteocytes) of two dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex and Brachylophosaurus canadensis. They claim to have found remnants of osteocytes, which could contain DNA. These remains are yet to be verified; and even if the cells contained DNA there may not be enough left to confirm its origin. Osteocytes are comparatively ‘invincible’ and cannot be destroyed and could be preserved in ancient tissue.
Dr Mary H Schweitzer, lead author of the study criticised the previous study, stating that “These authors did not test fossils dating back older, rather predicted that DNA would be gone by a certain time point”. She adds that her bone samples do not agree with this hypothesis; “We have 4 independent lines of evidence that there is material chemically consistent with DNA”
Even if DNA remains in these dinosaur bones, the slow degradation over time may mean not enough remains to study the genetic information of the animals through genetic sequencing. “We can’t demonstrate that the reactive material inside these dinosaur ‘cells’ is dinosaur DNA without sequence.”

So where does that leave Jurassic Park? For long strands of DNA to have any chance of surviving a 65 million year wait to the modern day, they would require perfect conditions. So could there be an untouched, perfectly preserved dinosaur genome under the Earth waiting to be discovered? “I would not completely dismiss the idea that that DNA can survive longer than we think under some extreme and rare conditions” explains Dr. Allenthoft, “but at the moment there is nothing suggesting that we will ever get authentic DNA from dinosaur bones”.

Wednesday 7 November 2012

Unwanted side effect: obesity

Do antibiotics make us fat?

Are Antibiotics Making Us Fat? - London Student
29 Oct 2012 | News and Features
Written by Helga Groll

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, medicine was revolutionised by the discovery that microorganisms such as mould, fungi, and bacteria could produce substances capable of curing bacterial infections. In present day, a world without these substances now known as antibiotics is hard to imagine. Antibiotics are ubiquitous in everyday life, from fattening farm animals to treating infectious diseases and even certain types of cancer. Unfortunately, the overuse of antibiotics is accompanied by several side effects, the most obvious being the antibiotic resistance of certain diseases. Scientists have now discovered that the use of antibiotics during early childhood can also increase the risk of obesity.
A population study of children, done by the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children in the UK, has investigated the impact of the use of antibiotics at different points during childhood. The survey comprised approximately 12,000 children born between 1991 and 1992, and took into account the weights and lifestyles of parents and children.
Whilst exposure to antibiotics between 6 and 14 months of age did not increase the risk of obesity, a clear link between antibiotics and obesity was found when antibiotics had been administered earlier in a child’s life. After having been given antibiotics before the age of 6 months, children were seen to have been affected at 38 months. However, when antibiotics were given between the ages of 15 and 23 months, effects became apparent only after several years. By the age of 7, about 17.6% of children were overweight and 8.3% were obese.
“The composition of micro flora in the gut, ‘good gut bacteria’, is important for a healthy body, and differences in composition or lack of bacteria can be associated with inflammatory bowel diseases, metabolic disorder, immunity and obesity”, explained Professor Brendan Wren, an expert in microbial pathogenesis at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The gut is a microbial jungle, containing a very complex environment of microbes that stimulate vital processes such as immune responses, hormone production, energy regulation, and growth. Even the slightest change in bacterial composition can have severe consequences for the hormonal balance, or energy uptake in cells.
Dr Cormac Gahan, a microbiologist at University College Cork, adds, “There is increasing evidence in linking gut bacteria with the risk of obesity, and specific types of bacteria might play a bigger role than others. Malfunctioning bacteria can influence the efficiency of energy extraction from the diet as well as influence hormone production”.
Dr Leonardo Trasande from New York University’s School of Medicine, who is the main author of the study, thinks that the obesity is due to the composition of micro flora in the gut. Gut bacteria in children might be less stable than those in adults, rendering children more vulnerable to adverse effects from antibiotics. In addition, increased use of antibiotics in children has also been linked to dermatitis, asthma and bowel diseases.

Antibiotics could have more side effects than previously anticipated. Due to recent advances in genetic research, it is only now possible to assess the complex composition of the population of microbes in the gut. This in turn will allow more in-depth study on the development of the bacteria, and of a variety of related diseases. More research will be needed to better understand the mechanisms of how antibiotics influence gut bacteria. The indirect impact that antibiotics have on us because of the widespread use of the drug in livestock also remains to be seen. The frequency and intensity of antibiotic use should certainly come under review to ensure we can continue to use this essential medicine.

Busy Bee

Well, unfortunately my blogging attempts came to an abrupt halt. As so often, I committed to too many things at once... But – if you’re interested here are some links to what I’ve been up too:

What's all the fuss about multivitamins and cancer prevention? In this blog article I demystify all the rumours about the "magic pills"